Construction Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) | Construction Engineering Management Services [USACE09009]

ProSidian Seeks a Construction Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) | Construction Engineering Management Services [USACE09009] for Program Support on a Exempt W2: No Overtime Pay Basis Working On-Site (Client Site) in The CONUS - Whiteman AFB, Missouri (On-Site) Area Contract Contingent generally located across the CONUS - Whiteman AFB, Missouri (On-Site) Across The Midwest Region supporting USACE Kansas City District needs on-site QAR to assure B‑21 beddown construction quality.

We seek Construction Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) | Construction Engineering Management Services [USACE09009] candidates with relevant Defense, And Security Sector Experience (functional and technical area expertise also ideal) to support professional services engagement for Defense, And Security Sector Clients such as USACE. This as a Contract Contingent or Contract W-2 (IRS-1099) Construction Engineering Management Services Functional Area / Swim Lane / Category Discipline Professional - Construction Management Services (CMS) – Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) Support (Whiteman AFB) Position; however, ProSidian reserves the right to convert to a Full-Time ProSidian employed W-2 Position.

JOB OVERVIEW

Provide services and support as a Construction Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) [Construction Management Services (CMS) – Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) Support (Whiteman AFB)] in the Defense, And Security Industry Sector focussing on Engineering Solutions for clients such as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (USACE) | USACE Kansas City District Generally Located In CONUS - Whiteman AFB, Missouri (On-Site) and across the Midwest Region (Of Country/World) Working On-Site (Client Site).

Provide Construction Management Services (CMS) Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) Support on behalf of The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District to support the safe, high-quality, and timely completion of construction projects at Whiteman Air Force Base (WAFB). The services will include monitoring contractor quality control systems, conducting site inspections, and ensuring adherence to contract specifications and security protocols. Quality Assurance Representatives adopt a partnering-based philosophy, using open and transparent communication to efficiently resolve construction-related impasses and disagreements.  Construction surveillance/inspection; ensuring contractor QC produces work conforming to plans/specs; reviewing QA reports and required tests. USACE construction QA policy also emphasizes documenting QA and using USACE CM systems/records. 

• Perform daily on-site quality assurance (QA) surveillance/inspections to verify construction work complies with contract plans, specifications, UFC/USACE standards, and approved submittals.
• Attend and document Contractor Quality Control (CQC) control phases/meetings; provide QA observations and communicate issues requiring correction.
• Document results of QA activities and tests, identify deficiencies, track contractor corrective actions, and record verbal instructions given to contractor personnel.
• Monitor progress of work and potential delays; record weather, manpower/equipment, materials, and other factors affecting schedule/performance.
• Identify and elevate issues that may lead to change orders or findings of fact; support preparation of documentation for contract administration.
• Collect/secure samples for required laboratory testing when applicable; review and report test results to support acceptance decisions.
• Monitor and document safety plan compliance and any safety infractions observed; report and track corrective actions.
• Maintain thorough QA records in USACE Construction Management systems of record (e.g., RMS) and project files; support closeout documentation as required.
• Coordinate with Government staff (COR, Area/Resident Engineer, Project Engineer) and contractor supervisors to resolve quality issues promptly while maintaining professional working relationships.

RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES - Construction Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) | Construction Engineering Management Services [USACE09009]

Construction Management / Quality Assurance / On-Site Construction Oversight ensuring contractor-performed work meets USACE standards, contract requirements, and mission readiness objectives. 

1. Reporting and Documentation:

1A - Daily Reports (RMS): Frequency: Daily (on days when construction activities are occurring); Format: Electronic entries within USACE Resident Management System (RMS) or Construction Management Platform (CMP); Content: Detailed narrative description of observed construction activities, weather conditions and their effect on the critical (longest) path of the project schedule, quantified progress against scheduled tasks, specific documented safety concerns (resolved or outstanding), detailed list of subcontractor manpower (by trade), identified deficiencies with supporting photographs (in areas where photos are permitted), documentation of environmental compliance (e.g., erosion control measures in place), provide comments on coordination/schedules/three-phase inspection meetings that are attended within 48 hours to the Project Engineer; Criteria for Acceptance: Completeness of all required RMS/CMP fields, accuracy of reported data as verified by Project Engineer spot-checks, timeliness of submission (within 24 hours of observation).

1B - Three-Phase Inspection Reports: Frequency: For each Definable Feature of Work (DFOW); Format: Standardized inspection checklist (provided by USACE or developed in coordination with USACE), and documented in RMS/CMP; Content: Verification of compliance with contract requirements at each phase (Preparatory, Initial, Follow-up); Identification of non-conformances and required corrective actions; Sign-off by QA Representative and Contractor QC representative; Criteria for Acceptance: Completeness of checklist, clear documentation of inspection results, timely identification of non-conformances, and verification of corrective actions.

1C - Deficiency Tracking Log Updates: Frequency: Daily (as applicable); Format: Electronic log within RMS/CMP or other designated tracking system; Content: List of all identified deficiencies, date of identification, responsible party for correction, planned corrective action, actual corrective action taken, date of verification of correction, current status (open/closed); Criteria for Acceptance: Accuracy of deficiency description, timely updates on status, verification of effective corrective actions, proactive escalation of unresolved deficiencies.

1D - Submittal Review Comment Input: Frequency: As submittals are received; Format: Spreadsheet or dedicated submittal management system; Content: List of all submittals reviewed, date received, date reviewed, comments provided, date comments were returned to contractor, status of review (approved, rejected, resubmit required), rationale for rejection or resubmission; Criteria for Acceptance: Timeliness of review (within [specified timeframe, e.g., 5 working days]), clarity and relevance of comments, consistent application of contractual requirements.

2. Proactive Identification and Mitigation:

2A - Early Warning Notices (Potential Risk Mitigation): Frequency: As needed; Format: Email or written memo to the USACE Project Engineer; Content: Description of potential risks to quality, schedule, safety, or cost, based on observations or analysis of contractor performance; Proposed mitigation strategies; Criteria for Acceptance: Timeliness of notification (before potential impact becomes a reality), clarity of risk description, feasibility of proposed mitigation strategies.

2B - Root Cause Analysis Reports (Repeat Deficiencies): Frequency: As determined by the USACE Project Engineer, triggered by repeat deficiencies in specific areas; Format: Formal report; Content: Detailed analysis of the root cause of recurring quality issues; Identification of contributing factors; Recommended corrective actions to prevent recurrence; Criteria for Acceptance: Thoroughness of analysis, identification of true root cause, effectiveness of recommended corrective actions.

3. Commissioning Support:

3A - Commissioning Observation Reports: Frequency: As commissioning activities occur; Format: Standardized checklist, photographic evidence (in areas where photos are permitted), and narrative documentation; Content: Detailed observation of commissioning activities for mechanical/electrical, data/communication systems, and specialized systems for B-21; Verification of proper system operation; Identification of any issues or discrepancies; Criteria for Acceptance: Completeness of checklist, accuracy of observations, clear documentation of system performance.

4. Meeting Contributions:

4A - Action Items Log (Weekly Progress Meetings): Frequency: Immediately following each weekly contractor meeting; Format: Electronic log (e.g., shared spreadsheet or project management tool); Content: Summary of action items assigned to the QA Representative, responsible parties, deadlines, and current status; Criteria for Acceptance: Accuracy and completeness of action item list, timely updates on status, proactive follow-up on outstanding items.

5. Schedule & Cost Proposal Support:

5A - Constructability Review Input (Modifications/Cost Proposals): Frequency: As needed when construction manager request modifications/cost proposals input; Format: Email or written memo to USACE Project Engineer with annotated drawings/specifications as needed; Content: Assessment of the constructability of proposed changes; Identification of potential quality or saf